Whether you have chosen is not PHP, it is in the following table based on price, speed, efficiency, security, platform support and performance on the open source or not, we can determine that it is far better than the strengths of weaknesses. The only downside is the lack of object-oriented support. However, this is a relatively minor defects, although the structure of language can not be ignored, but ultimately, good coding, or due to repeated practice, execution, good habits and discipline.

PHP 4 PHP 5 ASP.NET platform software prices Free Free Free Free Free price $ $ speed efficiency of strong intensity strong strong strong strong and weak platform security and strong security strength ( IIS>) platform support of any any win32 ( IIS>) is open Source Yes No exception mechanism No Yes OOP the weak strong

Price: I do not simply consider the first investment price, get PHP, is obviously free, but we have to consider the development, maintenance and commissioning costs, you may have to buy Zend engine optimization. For ASP, you will begin to invest in a product, but you will also technically in additional expenses, such as the library purchased graphics, or other. But in the long term, PHP does not require you to pay upgrade fees or buy more license. License to any person who has contact with will know that companies often will ensure compatibility spend a lot of time and money. In addition, find a bug and get feedback on the handling of repair are not the same, this fact can also be converted to time-consuming, thereby affecting the entire development cost.

rate and efficiency of: As I mentioned earlier, ASP.NET allows you use a different programming language framework. In addition, it boasts an excellent object-oriented programming model. True, but this has brought a reduction in speed. Talked about these advantages, the same function for the page is, compared to PHP, ASP pages running on the server needs analysis, implementation of more code. The PHP is “fast food-type” solution, the first feature to get, there are many issues you can stay on the robustness to 2.0 or 3.0 in the supplement, and its core code has been compiled optimized program can run at high speed. Speed ??is not the only consideration, memory consumption is also very important.

security: ASP.NET runs on top of IIS, this is a once numerous attacks on the system, almost weekly IT news will have a similar message. In fact, it has become a liability, regardless of how many dollars the market voted on it, many IT professionals have refused to expose their networks under the IIS Web server. The PHP and Apache work together, it has good speed, reliability, performance, and excellent security.
platform supporting: ASP.NET initially run on IIS, you can now run on Apache, but Apache can run on all platforms. PHP is inherently designed to run on Apache, so you have many proven and reliable platform to choose.

open source or not: that idealism is not just open source programmers patent, nor on those who want to save hundreds of dollars in license specific to the company. When you encounter the bug to buy the software itself, when open-source can yield is a Godsend.

whether to use ASP.NET or PHP, you may have many users using your software and found that bug. For ASP.NET, the bug to go through a bureaucratic process to inform, repair, verification, and then wait until the next patch release. The rehabilitation and release of PHP very quickly. Any read open-source development knows new product releases or patches are often the things within a few days rather than commercial software, like weeks or months. If you think that is not fast enough, and if you wish, you can own a direct repair.

Source link: http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1486621

(Editor Phoenix sunsj@51cto.com TEL: (010) 68476636-8007)